Translate

Tuesday, August 15, 2023

Mary in the Life of Religious (2)

Marian Dimension in Religious Life in General: Tradition and New Constitutions

The post-conciliar magisterium has continued to insist on the importance of the Marian dimension in religious life. One of the possible reasons it does so is because of the long tradition of Mary's presence in the life of religious. To give as examples, many congregations foster aspects of Marian spirituality and invoke Mary with appropriate and special titles. They develop the Marian cult, prayers, devotions, office in honor of Mary, rosary, litany, Via Matris Dolorosa, Saturday devotion, May devotion, scapular, habit, and others. Music and art are also filled with many Marian elements - many of which are attributed to religious. Furthermore, Mary is looked upon in many contemplative orders as the "Abbess" and "Mother General". [4]

Aside from those mentioned above, probably one of the more important contributions to the Marian element in religious life is the Consecration to Mary which many orders and congregations introduce. A man of the 17th century by the name of St. Louis-Marie de Montfort, founder of the Company of Mary, introduced a "Radical Consecration" (Slavery of Love) which is deepened in its theological, spiritual and pastoral aspect. The consecration he introduced is "radical" because it is the Perfect Consecration to Jesus through Mary - a perfect renewal of the baptismal vows. This consecration involves an interior attitude and an easy, sure, fast way to live responsibly our Christian life and to grow in Christ. By it, religious and also even laity (in the previous experiences of consecration, it is offered only to religious) are able to offer themselves totally and entirely to Jesus through the hands of Mary. [5]

We also have to look at the Constitutions of the various religious institutes to see how Mary plays an important role in their lives. The rules of many of these religious institutes present Mary as the model of perfection; they inculcate in the members imitation of Mary and filial love and service to her. [6]

Endnotes:

[4] L. de Candido, Vita Consacrata, in Nuovo Dizionario di Mariologia, (Torino: Edizioni Paoline, 1985), p. 1482-1512.
[5] Ibid.
[6] Kaitholil, Hail, Full of Grace, p. 110.

Marian Dimension in Religious Life in General: Marian Traits in Religious Life

Besides all that is said so far, we can also take a look at how Mary is an important dimension in the life of the various kinds of religious institutes through the Marian traits which they incarnate in their particular life. Monastic orders, which number around 50 and stress "fuga mundi" (flight from the world) and "sequela Christi" (Christ's discipleship) in their lives, highlight the Marian trait of contemplation; canons regular which number around 10 and stress "ministry" and the "Choral singing of the Divine Office" in their lives, highlight the Marian trait of praise; mendicant orders, which number around 16 and stress "itinerant life and preaching", "poverty", "fraternity", highlight the Marian trait of simplicity; institutes of apostolic life, which number about 150 (for men) and 1270 (for women) and stress "service" and "evangelization", emphasize the Marian trait of availability to service as cooperation with the mystery of salvation; secular institutes, which number about 130 and stress "domestic asceticism", incarnate the Marian trait of cooperation with Christ in their day-to-day life; and societies of apostolic life, which stress "apostolic life in common", incarnate the Marian trait of communion with the apostles both within and outside the cenacle. [7]

Although all of the aforementioned elements illustrate how Mary plays an important role in the life of religious in general, we still have to look at the deeper and more interior realities of both Mary's life and the life of religious to discover the parallelisms and similarities that would eventually lead us to affirm Mary as our model and ideal.

Through exploring the more intimate dimensions of Mary's life and the life of religious, we will truly know how religious life comes to understand itself most deeply in the person of Mary.

Endnotes:

[7] De Candido, Vita Consacrata, p. 1482-1512.

Monday, August 14, 2023

Mary in the Life of Religious (1)

Mary, in the Life of Religious: An Exposition and Reflection

A paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Mariology, Maryhill School of Theology, Quezon City, Philippines

Mariology was an elective offered to theology students. The class was originally intended to be a class on icons on Mary but as the course proceeded, the subject and themes of the lessons to include other expressions of devotion to Mary and its theology.

The class was taught by Sr. Angela Nijssen, scmm.

Bibliography

Beyer, Jean (compiler). John Paul II Speaks to Religious. Principal Allocutions from November 1978 to December 1980.

De Candido, L. Vita Consacrata, in Nuovo Dizionario di Mariologia. Edited by Stefano de Fiores and Salvatore Meo. Torino: Edizioni Paoline 1985.

Flannery, Austin (editor). Vatican Council II: The Conciliar and Post Conciliar Documents. 2 volumes. New York: Costello Publishing Company 1984.

Jegen, Carol Frances (editor). Mary According to Women. Kansas City: Sheed and Ward 1985.

Kaitholil, George. Hail, Full of Grace: An Encounter With Mary. Bandra-Bombay: St. Paul Publications 1987.

Malaviaratchi, Anthony. Initiation into Religious Life: A Catechesis for Formation. Bangalore: Redemptorist Publications India, no date.

Metz, Johannes B. Followers of Christ: The Religious Life and the Church. Translated by Thomas Linton. London: Burns & Oates 1978.

Union of Superiors General. Religious Life 20 Years After Vatican II: Evaluation and Prospective. 32nd Villa Cavalletti Meeting, May 28-31, 1986.

Abbreviations Used:

LG - Lumen Gentium
PC - Perfectae Caritatis
ET - Evangelica Testificatio
RD - Redemptionis Donum
Can - Canon Law
DV - Dei Verbum
MC - Marialis Cultus

Introduction

Since the 2nd Vatican Council, the central element of the theological identity of religious life has been the Christological element. According to the magisterium of the Church, this Christological dimension continues to be, also for the future, the most valid and fruitful dimension of the theology of religious life. What does this dimension mean? This means that religious life refers directly to the biblical figure of Christ: religious life is the ecclesial continuation of the life of Christ proposed by Christ himself to his disciples. [1] The following conciliar and post conciliar document texts point out these main affirmations clearly and explicitly:

"The teaching and example of Christ provide the
foundation for the evangelical counsels of chaste
self-dedication to God, of poverty and of obedience..."
(LG 43).

"Since the final norm of the religious life is the following
of Christ as it is put before us in the Gospel, this must
be taken by institutes as the supreme rule..."
(PC 3a).

"...the supreme rule of the religious life and its ultimate
norm is that of the following of Christ according to the
teaching of the Gospel" (ET 12).


Although the Christological dimension is the central point of the theology of religious life, there is another dimension also of importance - the Mariological dimension. This is the dimension which I wish to take up and study in this paper.

In this paper, I wish to explore the meaning of Mary in relation to religious life.

If we examine the exterior aspects and the historical and sociological aspects of the life of religious and that of Mary, we can conclude without any doubt that they are indeed different. However, if we look much more clearly at these same lives in their more intimate dimensions and in their profound reality, we will see that there are many resemblances: they are lives that are charismatically parallel. [2]

It is with sobriety and courage that the Council proposed Our Lady as the model of religious life. The Council knows that the personality of Mary is so rich, her spirituality so profound, and virtues so perfect, that religious can find in her an ideal to follow. Religious who dedicate themselves to live the Christian vocation in the most radical sense can find in Mary their mother and model. [3] The following texts support this theme explicitly:

"The beloved Mother of the Lord, at whose example
you have consecrated your life to God" (ET 17).


"...In this message, I address myself to you, to invite
you to revive your religious consecration, according to
the model of the consecration of the Mother of God."
(RD 17)


This theme also finds its place in the new Code of Canon Law:

"May they honor by a special worship...the Virgin
Mother of God, model and patroness of all consecrated
life." (Can 663, 4)


The abovementioned documents explicitly state that Mary plays a specific role in the life of religious: she is the model and example of the religious. What does this mean for the purpose of my study? I have especially chosen to deal and explore the said topic because it specifically has to do a lot with my vocation and call as a religious. Mary plays a significant role in my being a religious and I wish to undertake this study to expand and deepen my horizon of understanding as regards my vocation to the religious life.

In this paper, there is one particular point I wish to add and make clear so as not to mislead the readers - that Mary is not a religious in the sense and meaning that we understand it in history. Her life and the life of religious (from its inception up to today) are different from one another. But however, if we look deeper into the interior dimensions of the life of Mary and that of religious, we will discover quite a number of similarities. It is in this light that I intend to establish the parallels and explain in a more detailed manner why the Council proposed Mary as the model of religious life.

In my study, I will show that Mary is indeed such a model by the way she had responded to the call of God in her pilgrimage of faith. However, please bear in mind that due to the limitations surrounding my research, I will not tackle all the possible points that come up as they relate to my study.

Firstly, I would proceed with the study by giving a general idea of the mariological dimension of religious life as it was lived in tradition. The purpose of this is to show that Mary has already been in the past an element present in the life of religious. Secondly, I would establish the parallels between the life of Mary and that of religious by exploring the various elements that they have in common. It is by examining the more intimate dimensions of the two that we can discover why Mary is indeed a model for us religious. Thirdly (before I conclude), I would try to situate Mary's exemplary role within the context of religious life today - her being a Mother, help and guide to religious and her being a model of justice and of the option for the poor.

Endnotes:


[1] Union of Superiors General, "Religious Life 20 Years After Vatican II", 32nd Villa Cavalletti Meeting, May 28-31, 1986, p. 2.
[2] Ibid., p. 20.
[3] Dr. George Kaitholil, SSP, Hail, Full of Grace,
(Bandra-Bombay: St. Paul Publications, 1987), p. 103.

Memorial of Saints (August 14)

St. Maximilian Maria Kolbe broadened the concept of Christian martyrdom to include "martyrs of charity" - that is, men and women who have died for Christ to save another person's life. A member of the Conventual Franciscans, Maximilian Kolbe was arrested during World War II for actively supporting Jewish refugees. He was sent to the concentration camp at Auschwitz. On July 31, in reprisal for a prisoner's escape, ten prisoners were randomly selected to die in place of the escaped prisoner. When one of those randomly chosen pleaded for his life because he had a wife and two children, St. Maximilian Kolbe offered his life in place of that man with a family. Maximilian Kolbe was executed together with others by being injected with carbolic acid (died 1941 A.D.).

St. Eusebius of Rome was a priest who opposed the Arian Emperor Constantius. He was imprisoned by the Arian authorities, in a small room of his house for seven months and eventually died there. Nothing more is known about Eusebius except that he lived in the 4th century A.D. and founded a church in Rome (died ca. 357 A.D.).

St. Marcellus of Apamea was a judge on the island of Cyprus before he became a bishop of Apamea, Syria. Emperor Theodosius the Great enacted an edict proclaiming that all pagan temples in the Empire were to be destroyed. St. Marcellus obeyed the edict and destroyed the pagan temples in his diocese. As a result, a group of pagans took hold of him and burned him to death (died ca. 389 A.D.).

St. Fachanan studied under St. Ita and founded the Molana Monastery on an island in the Blackwater. He also founded the monastic school of Ross (Rosscarbery), in Cook, Ireland. This monastic school became a famous center of monasticism in Ireland (died ca. 6th century A.D.).

St. Athanasia was widowed only 16 days after her marriage. Her husband was killed fighting the invading Arabs in Greece. She remarried, but her second husband wanted to become a monk after their marriage. On her part, St. Athanasia consented, and she then decided to be a nun. Using her home as a convent, she became abbess of a community of nuns. They soon moved their convent community to Timia. It was here in Timia that St. Athanasia spent her last years (died ca. 860 A.D.).